Ipinapakita ang mga post na may etiketa na PHILIPPINE. Ipakita ang lahat ng mga post
Ipinapakita ang mga post na may etiketa na PHILIPPINE. Ipakita ang lahat ng mga post

Linggo, Oktubre 20, 2013

ITO BA ANG DAANG MATUWID NI PNOY???

BASAHIN NATIN!!!

HARAPAN, GINAGAGO TAYO NG MGA ITO. 


FROM MANILA TIMES

by RIGOBERTO TIGLAO


Doing research on some other topic, I stumbled on what at first I thought were outdated information. But the info turned out to be accurate—and troubling.
The conglomerate Philippine Investment Management Inc. (Phinma) listed as one of its board members Jose Cuisia. Isn’t he our current “Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary to the United States, with concurrent jurisdiction over the Virgin Islands, Grenada and the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico?”
Yes he is. And not only that, our ambassador is presently active in nine other firms, which certainly aren’t just mom-and-pop outfits.
He is vice-chairman in the Philippine American Life and General Insurance Co., in which he had been CEO for a decade until its American owners, AIG, went bankrupt and had to sell out to Asian investors. He is also vice chairman of the company, which is at the core of Henry Sy’s empire, SM Prime Holdings.
He is a director of the Ayalas’ Manila Water Co., in cement conglomerate Holcim Philippines, in call-center firm Integra Business Processing Solutions, in property firm ICCP Holdings, and in Beacon Property Ventures.
I nearly fell off my seat reading this information: Cuisia is chairman of The Covenant Car Co.
Cuisia20131021
Why do I find that shocking? The Covenant Car Company is the sole importer and distributor of the US company Chevrolet’s cars in the Philippines, and I’m certain Cuisia doesn’t know much about the car business.

Its Filipino stockholders might as well have put up a neon sign at their showrooms: Trust us, our chairman is the ambassador to the US, and he sees the Chevrolet chairman often there.
With that number of directorships in major firms, Cuisia is obviously raking it in while he is our underpaid ambassador to the US. Strangely though, he seems to have become exempt from BIR rules since he became ambassador in 2010. Reported as the Bureau of Internal Revenue’s 55th biggest taxpayer in 2009 and paying P13 million in taxes, Cuisia has completely dropped out of the lists for 2010, 2011, and 2012.

Is Cuisia’s continuing employment in private firms while he is the Philippine ambassador to the US legal? If it is, is it proper?
I’m sure that The Covenant Car Co., Phinma Life, SM malls, Manila Water, and Integra Business Processing Solutions would have one way or another have business dealings in the world’s biggest economy.

Does having the Philippine Ambassador to the US as its chairman, vice-chairman or director give that company an unfair edge to its competitors? Or is Cuisia violating in principle the civil service code’s prohibition on conflict-of-interest situations of civil servants employed in private firms?
(The only other civil servant I know who is as busy as Cuisia in private firms is Social System Chairman Juan Santos, who sits in the board of Philex Mining and Philippine Long Distance Telephone Co. where the SSS has shares in and in seven other major corporations, including Phinma and First Philippine Holdings.)

But the really important question is not even the legality and morality of a Philippine ambassador busy in ten private companies.
The US is the most important country we have diplomatic relations with. That’s an understatement. As a nation, we’re depending on the US for our security, and after ranting at China, and bad-mouthing it as a bully, our foreign secretary right after would sheepishly glance at Uncle Sam to be assured that it will defend the country if the Chinese really gets pissed off.
The US is also where we have the biggest population of migrant Filipinos, whom we can tap as a powerful lobby group for our national interests, as American Jews have done for decades. As a nation we also have the responsibility to assist them in preserving their Filipino heritage.

Our ambassador represents both the President and the entire country in the world of nations. He can’t be often absent in that job making money in the Philippines.
But maybe his membership in these firms’ board is just titular, and his involvement is through Skype or some of kind of teleconferencing.

Nope. Cuisia is even chairman of Phinma’s compensation committee and a member of its board’s executive committee. In SM Prime, he is chairman of its Risk Management and Audit Committee, and member of its Nomination Committee.
Cuisia has religiously attended in the Philippines each and every meeting of the board of the companies he is a director of, so that he is out of his US post from three days to a week every month.
Our ambassador to the US is not within his area of jurisdiction and travels to the Philippines for several days every month. Does the foreign affairs department pay for Cuisia’s first-class fare or is it the firms he is involved in?
I was surprised over Cuisia’s continued board memberships as I had the impression that this was forbidden, either by civil regulations or by practice in the foreign affairs department.
I remember there were magnates who wanted to be ambassadors during President Arroyo’s term, but who later on declined after being told they would have to take a leave from their companies. Tycoons Jaime Zobel de Ayala and Edgardo Espiritu had to take a leave of absence from their businesses when they served as ambassadors to the United Kingdom
Cuisia’s monthly travel to the Philippines is actually quite a remarkable feat.

Ambassadors are required to get an approval not only from the foreign affairs secretary but also from the President or the Executive Secretary when he leaves his post.
Not only that. The foreign secretary has to formally issue a document appointing a chargĂ© d’affaires, or the official in charge of the Embassy while he ambassador is away. Not only that. The embassy has to report to the State Department (or the foreign affairs ministry in other countries) that the ambassador is not in the country, and that the chargĂ© d’affaires will temporarily represent the nation. I doubt if Cuisia bothered with these required documentation.

All these paper work only emphasizes the fact that part of an ambassador’s job description is that he can leave his post only for official reasons or in an emergency. I wonder how Cuisia justified his board meetings with Phinma, SM and the other eight companies as “attending to official matters.”
An ambassador’s job is actually a very demanding one if one takes his work seriously. Filipino organizations demand the personal presence of the ambassador in their social activities. You can dismiss these as petty events, but one can also see these as opportunities to strengthen your links to the Filipino community you also represent in that land.



The Migrant Workers and Overseas Filipinos Act of 1995 in effect even gave our ambassadors a new, demanding duty of protecting OFWs in their posts, a job no other country has asked of their ambassadors.
What also makes an ambassador’s work practically limitless is the fact that to pursue the country’s interests, he has to make friends with the elite of the country he is covering, and this requires unending invitations to them for lunch or dinner. These requires the patience and energies of a salesman, since a single addition to an ambassador’s stock of friends would be another source of support when the Philippines need something from that host government.
Having a part-time ambassador is even a bit of an insult to the country he is posted in, as it sends the message that it is not that important a nation that it is not a full-time job for our ambassador, who will be away a week every month. I wouldn’t be surprised if Americans think of us so poor that we have to allow our ambassador in the US to make money in private firms while he is in his post.

No wonder we aren’t getting anything really substantial from the US, other than their empty blah-blahs supporting our saber-rattling against China, no wonder our embassy can’t even lobby successfully for the US president to visit our country.

tiglao.manilatimes@gmail.com
www.rigobertotiglao.com and www.trigger.ph

Linggo, Agosto 25, 2013

SURRENDER YOUR PORK BARREL

KUNG TUWID TALAGA ANG PAGKATAO MO, SURRENDER YOUR PORK BARREL
KUNG TOTOONG DAANG MATUWID KA, YOU SHOULD BE THE FIRST TO ABOLISH YOUR PORK BARREL AND PRESIDENTIAL FUND AMOUNTING TO HUNDREDS OF BILLIONS OF PESOS!

AT HUWAG KANG MAG BINGI-BINGIAN, KASALI KA SA IMBESTIGASYON AT HUSGA NG TAONG BAYAN!

Biyernes, Agosto 23, 2013

A FAMILY OF EXTORTIONISTS


 HYPOCRITES.....

 

HIGH-HANDED RIGHTEOUSNESS ( WALA NAMANG NAGAWA SA ECONOMY )


SORE LOSERS.......
CERTIFIED IDIOTS AND CRETINS...........


PRETENDERS TO THE THRONE OF GOD........

Miyerkules, Mayo 1, 2013

LOREN LEGARDA - HYPOCRITE TALAGA!

Inimpeach-impeach nila si Corona, pero sila lumalabas ngayon na sinungaling!

Loren’s hidden $700K Manhattan condo bared

  • Written by 
  • Thursday, 02 May 2013 00:00
US assets not included in SALn makes her liable for graft, perjury 
Re-electionist Sen. Loren Legarda was one of 20 senators who had voted to convict impeached Chief Justice Renato Corona for not declaring his dollar accounts as well as his properties where he failed to state the acquisition cost in his Statement of Assets and Liabilities and net worth (SALn).
However, it appears, from photos and documents obtained by the Tribune yesterday that Legarda herself has not declared her condominium asset in Manhattan, New York City.
This has led Louis “Barok” Biraogo, a declared public interest advocate that Legarda may be as “guilty” as the impeached Chief Justice in not declaring all of her properties in her SALn.
Biraogo stated emphatically that: “I have all the documentary evidence. I have the smoking gun needed to prove that Legarda does not deserve to stay a minute longer as a senator of the land.”
He stressed that “Legarda should be ashamed to even be campaigning on the same stage as President Aquino under his daang-matuwid (straight path) platform.”
Biraogo claimed that Legarda has been concealing for five years her purchase on May 9, 2006 of a posh condominium unit in New York City. He bared that Legarda had paid in full and in cash the princely price of $700,000 or about P36 million in the exchange rate prevailing in 2006 to acquire the condo unit at #77 Park Avenue, which is a very expensive area in New York where the Rockefellers and Trumps also have properties.

For Legarda to have the ready cash of $700,000 or close to three quarters of a million dollars, it was also asked by others whether she had declared her dollar account in her SALns.
A Youtube video has been making the rounds of her posh condo and the many documents attesting to her ownership of the Manhattan condo, as well as copies of her SALns, where her acquisitions and her total assets failed to reflect either her condominium or her correct total assets.
Even her home in Urdaneta Village was not listed as part of her assets, even when it belongs to her, as she listed this down as a corporation known as Loren Legarda and Associates, where her relatives own one share each while she owns the rest.
Armed with Legarda’s SALns which the senator challenged anyone to secure as they are “public record,” Biraogo pointed out that Legarda hid from public scrutiny the condo unit she bought in 2006 by not declaring it in her SALns covering the years 2007 up to 2010.
“Lo and behold! It was only in her 2011 SALn that Legarda declared for the very first time her ownership of a property in America which she claimed she had acquired for P27,800,000. Let’s not forget that she filed her 2011 SALn at about the time when the impeachment trial of Corona was already at fever pitch,” said Biraogo.

Deathly afraid?
“What made Legarda declare a US property in her 2011 SALN? Was it because she became very, very afraid that she would be in the same boat as Corona – that her hidden condo unit at #77 Park Avenue would be found? Well, as it turns out, she has every reason to be deathly afraid,” said Biraogo.
Whether or not the US property referred to by Legarda in her 2011 SALn is the same as the one at #77 Park Avenue, Biraogo said Legarda, “like Corona before her, is already damaged goods” because the late declaration would not absolve her of what he calls the wrongdoing.
“She should consider withdrawing from the May elections because she will face removal like what happened to Corona. Despite her self-righteous stance during the trial of Corona, Legarda has every reason to be afraid, more afraid now that the truth has finally come out on her US property,” said Biraogo.
“What do we have in Senator Legarda now, a veritable Lady Corona? Well, I suggest she hire a good lawyer because she may be facing plunder raps and multiple counts of money laundering, as well as graft and corruption and perjury charges. She has to explain where she got the money to buy such an expensive property,” said Biraogo.
“Legarda’s declaration of a US property in her 2011 SALn was a pathetic attempt at cover-up because she, as a senator, should know better than most that the SALn law is very specific on the details that a SALn filer must input on the SALn form,” said Biraogo.
“With Legarda leaving blank in the SALn form the details that would have identified the location of that unspecified US property, as well as its current fair market value or if improvements had been done on it, she might as well have not declared it all.”

Huge increases
The pertinent laws governing SALns are strict that public officials must detail all of their assets and liabilities, including the acquisition and fair market value and the addresses of real properties, as well as their investments and bank deposits.
Biraogo noted the huge increase in Legarda’s net worth – from P45,545,565 in 2010 to P68,553,755 in 2011 ; and the big increase in her cash on hand in banks — from P180,000 in 2010 to P7,963,190 in 2011.
He stressed that huge increases in the net worth of public officials, if unsupported by commensurate sources of income, are automatically deemed to be ill-gotten wealth.
“Legarda paid $700,000 in 2006 for the unit at #77 Park Avenue or P35,980,000 at the exchange rate of P51.40-$1 at the time. If that’s the same unit referred to by Legarda in her 2011 SALn, then she undervalued it by claiming the acquisition cost to be just P27,800,000” said Biraogo.
“Using the peso-exchange rate in 2011 instead of the prevailing rate in 2006 may be another clue that Legarda was already frazzled, dazed and confused even, when she declared that acquisition cost of P27,800,000.”
Biraogo said that if Legarda admits that the unit at #77 Park Avenue was what was being referred to in her 2011 SALn, then the harder question for her to answer would be why was the property she bought in 2006 declared only in her 2011 SALn?”
Legarda and the majority of the senators last year ousted Corona from the Supreme Court after finding him guilty of mis- and non-declarations in his SALns of assets, including ownership of several condo units.

Same yardstick
Biraogo said that Legarda should suffer the same fate as Corona, adding that “sauce for the goose should also be sauce for the gander. “
“Senator Legarda should be measured with the same yardstick she used in convicting Corona for being untruthful in his SALn,” said Biraogo, who said he got interested in digging deep into Legarda’s SALn and properties when he learned that their alma mater, the University of the Philippines, would be honoring her as a top alumna.
Biraogo has figured in many national issues and celebrated court cases, starting in his sophomore law student year in UP Diliman when he sued then UP president Edgardo Angara all the way to the Supreme Court for increasing UP’s tuition and other fees by 350 percent.
In 1985, Biraogo challenged before the SC the constitutionality of the snap presidential election which triggered the 1986 People Power Revolt. He also contested in court the customs duties slapped on imported reading materials, pressuring then President Gloria Arroyo into ordering then Finance Secretary Margarito Teves to honor the Philippines’ being a signatory of Florence Treaty forbidding the slapping of customs duties on reading materials.

Published in Headlines

Martes, Abril 23, 2013

HE HAS DONE NOTHING

WHY WOULD HE BE A HERO WHEN HE DID NOT DO ANYTHING?

HE WAS RICH.

HE WAS EDUCATED. 

HE WAS MEMBER OF THE ELITE FAMILY.

HE MARRIED A COJUANGCO.

HE WAS NOT A MEMBER OF THE MASA.

HE HAD NO SIGNIFICANT CONTRIBUTION.

ALL HE DID WAS TO FIGHT MARCOS WITH WORDS AND MORE WORDS.

IN OTHER WORDS, NINOY WAS JUST A DEMAGOGUE.

PURO SALITA, WALA NAMANG NAGAWA O FOUNDATION MAN LANG PARA SA MAHIRAP. 

HACENDERO, TRADPOL AT LAHI NG MAKAPILI.


Lunes, Abril 22, 2013

GREEDY VULTURE

GINA, YOU ARE LIKE THE REST OF THEM. SWAPANG AT HIPOKRITA KA RIN PALA!

SANA TADTARIN KA NG MGA TRIBAL PEOPLE NG PALAWAN.
LANDGRABBER!

Lunes, Enero 28, 2013

A CONGENITAL LIAR. DO YOU STILL BELIEVE HIM?



This monkey went to Davos, Switzerland lately to promote the nation's interest. Allegedly, he spoke to a lot of world leaders about setting up their investments here. Really?

This is what former Philippine leaders have to say of our Buffoon President:

Manila Standard Today

UNA says Davos trip big junket
By Christine F. Herrera | Posted on Jan. 29, 2013 at 12:01am | 728 views
The opposition United Nationalist Alliance on Monday hammered President Benigno Aquino III for what it described as an excessive P49-million junket to Davos, Switzerland last week, where he brought a 64-member entourage that included his personal chef.
In a news conference, UNA senatorial candidates Ernesto Maceda and Richard Gordon said the President only spoke about the country’s anti-corruption efforts before a small gathering of 50 delegates and without any other heads of state present, and brought home no new investments.
The Palace, however, made it appear that the President was a keynote speaker at the World Economic Forum attended by 1,500 delegates, including 63 heads of state.
“The President did not address the plenary. He was made to speak in the sidelines, before a small panel of 50 people without any other head of state present,” Maceda told the news conference.
“In short, bringing in an entourage of 63 and spending for their stay there amounting to P49 million was not only excessive and useless but a big waste of taxpayers’ money,” Maceda said.
UNA Secretary General and Navotas Rep. Tobias Tiangco said he wouldn’t be surprised if the small crowd was all of the President’s entourage. “The panel numbered 50 and the President’s entourage was 63. The entourage even outnumbered the delegates who heard the President speak,” Tiangco said.
Executive Secretary Paquito Ochoa Jr. said the government allocated P49 million for the President’s three-day trip to Switzerland.
“The President is expected to highlight the administration’s anti-corruption campaign and make a pitch on the Philippines’ readiness to receive more investments,” Ochoa said.
Gordon said the Palace could not feign ignorance because the European organizers of the WEF provided them with the program and itinerary.
Gordon said no other meetings with the President or his Cabinet were part of Mr. Aquino’s itinerary.
“So we are not surprised that no investments were brought home,” Gordon said.
Ochoa said the President was scheduled to meet with top executives of German car giant Volkswagen as well as International Monetary Fund managing director Christine Lagarde.
The President’s 63-member delegation included Foreign Affairs Secretary Albert Del Rosario, Finance Secretary Cesar Purisima, Trade Secretary Gregory Domingo, Budget Secretary Florencio Abad, Socio-Economic Planning Secretary Arsenio Balisacan, Cabinet Secretary Rene Almendras, Presidential Communications Development Secretary Ramon Carandang and his personal chef.

“So who among these Cabinet secretaries were able to meet their counterparts and discuss potential business ventures?” Maceda asked




Miyerkules, Disyembre 19, 2012

ABUSADO ANG PUTA NG INA NIYANG ITO!

ABUSADO. TARANTADO. HINDI TAYO SIGURADO.

MGA KABABAYAN, HUWAG KAYO MANINIWALA NA SA PANGASINAN AT PAMPANGA LANG ANG JUETENG ISSUES. SI TONYBOY COJUANGCO MISMO ANG COLLECTOR NG CENTRAL LUZON PAYOLA. REIMBURSEMENT NIYA SA PINANGGASTOS NIYA SA ELEKSYON NI PNOY PANOT.

TUWID NA DAANG BULOK PALA!
SINUNGALING ANG ATING PRESIDENTE!