INIDORO

         "I repeat, hindi po ako isang KUBETA."

IKAW RIN, MAG-INGAT

 

 AKALA MO NAKAKALIMUTAN NAMIN YUNG KASALANAN MO SA AMIN???

TANDAAN MO MR ROXAS, NAWALAN KAMI NG BENEFITS NG DAHIL SA IYO.

HINDI NAMIN KAKALIMUTAN YUN.

MAG INGAT KA NA MR PRESIDENT

MARAMI KANG WINASAK NA BUHAY. 
NA LAY-OFF KAMI SA MGA TRABAHO NAMIN AT ANG TANGING KASALANAN LANG NAMIN AY NAGING CONTRACTUAL KAMI SA PANAHON NI GLORIA.

MGA SIMPLENG TAO LAMANG KAMI MR. PRESIDENT. 

AT PINAG-INITAN MO KAMING LAHAT???

NATIONALIZE SM AND MERALCO!!!

NATIONALIZE MERALCO AND SHOEMART

 Let the People of this country own these business!

They already profited and it is time that MERALCO and SM be turned over to the people!

MARTIAL LAW should be declared by the NEXT caretaker PRESIDENT and expel the OLIGARCHS AND JESUITS FROM THE COUNTRY!!!

MGA ANTIPATIKO SA MALACANANG

WORM’S EYEVIEW: Why discourage assembly or curtail autonomy?

By Manny Valdehuesa on March 24 2014 12:13 am

CAGAYAN DE ORO CITY (MindaNews/23 March) — There will be “synchronized” Barangay Assembly meetings nationwide on Saturday, March 29.

It’s unclear how synchronized assemblies promote autonomy or local governance, but it is routine practice now although it has no palpable effect on governing efficiency or proficiency.

In any case, consider these thoughts as you prepare for this week’s assembly.

If you limit the way people exercise discretion, a right, or an entitlement, you dampen creativity
or initiative, encourage laziness or dependency, and discourage autonomy or resourcefulness.

This is what the President unwittingly did when he issued Proclamation No. 260 in September 2011. Through it he decreed that barangays assemble only twice yearly — once on the last Saturday of March and again on the second Sunday of October.

The proclamation attracted little or no attention; not even from Congress. No pork or perks or DAP, I guess. But it was a radical move. It ran counter to Sec. 397 of Republic Act 7160 (the Local Government Code) which states: “The Barangay Assembly shall meet at least twice a year….” which certainly means it may meet more than two times or as often as it wishes.

P-Noy amended the law and no one in Congress gave a hoot!

In his proclamation the phrase “AT LEAST” somehow transmogrified to mean “AT MOST”—which of course was wrong. Compounding the wrong, the Department of the Interior and Local Government (DILG) directed all the 42,000+ barangays of the nation to comply with it year after year. So it subsists to this day and no one seems concerned.

Limiting People Power

What happens now to the right of citizens to convene their Barangay Assembly—which, although admittedly still dysfunctional, is their parliament and legislative governing body?

Composed as it is of all voting residents, this Assembly has superior authority over all officials and units of the barangay government. After all, it’s literally a CONSTITUENT ASSEMBLY! And it has right to convene at any time, as many times as it wishes. But the President says otherwise.

Through Proclamation No. 260 he drastically limits the community’s capability to meet and address local governance issues. Too bad for autonomy and the principle of subsidiarity.

Perhaps it doesn’t occur to the President, or no one tells him, that this Assembly is our local parliament, that it has power to straighten out policy or programs through initiative, as well as power to discipline any official through recall. Powerful!

It also doesn’t seem to strike the President that delimiting or reducing the frequency of barangay deliberations violates the need for free and open exchange of ideas at the grassroots. Does he know that this also constricts the democratic space and strengthens the hand of trapo oligarchs who seek to monopolize or manipulate local governance.

Awaken, Not Deaden, Citizen Initiative!

Someone should tell him that in issuing the Proclamation, he was in violation thrice over: 1) he unilaterally changed the law (Sec. 397 of R.A. 71600) without benefit of congressional action or concurrence; 2) he curtailed the right of citizens to exercise their sovereign right to assemble and engage in deliberative conversations as often as they wish; and 3) he hinders the formation of the popular will on how the local government should proceed with its business (usually expressed in resolutions or declarations after copious debate, discussion, or exchange).

All this was brought home to me during the aftermath of Typhoon Sendong in Cagayan de Oro over three years ago.

Because more than one-third of the city’s barangays were badly punished by Sendong, I thought that it would help the victims greatly if the survivors throughout the city could assemble and regroup. They could then take stock of the damage, the dead, and the missing. But as it happened, they were loath to assemble because they were told that they had already done so two months earlier (in October).

When the DILG Secretary visited the city, our movement suggested that he authorize the Barangay Assemblies to convene so the affected ones could do stock-taking and plan their recovery while the less affected ones could discuss how to marshal their resources to help victims.

To my consternation, the request was denied on the spot. They had already convened twice before Sendong, he said. I explained in vain that that was before and we were now in an emergency, that in any case the law does not limit the number of times a Barangay Assembly can meet, and that the bottom line should be to let the barangaynons decide because it’s their Assembly after all.

All I got for an answer was a look that said, “Mas marunong ka pa sa akin!” as he turned to leave. Beside him at the time was DSWD Secretary Dinky Soliman who could only shrug and flash her signature smile.

In any case, it struck me that the very agency charged with empowering people by promoting the spirit of autonomy or self-governance was preventing the exercise of initiative in victimized communities. I was clearly one of the affected people, and so was the Gising Barangay Movement, but we were ignored! It made me wonder if the attitude reflected the President’s, because it certainly didn’t lift my enthusiasm or that of the people around me.

(MindaViews is the opinion section of MindaViews. Manny Valdehuesa is former UNESCO regional director for Asia-Pacific, secretary-general of Southeast Asian Publishers Association, director at Development Academy of the Philippines, member of Philippine Mission to the United Nations, vice chair of Local Government Academy, member of the Cory Government’s Peace Panel, and PPI-UNICEF awardee for outstanding columnist. You may email him at  valdehuesa@gmail.com)

Read more http://www.mindanews.com/mindaviews/2014/03/24/worms-eyeview-why-discourage-assembly-or-curtail-autonomy/

ANG BUTETE AT ANG AMPAW

 

LA GORILLA

CORRUPT IMMIGRATION JAIL WARDEN

Why is Immigration Executive Director Eric Dimaculangan still holding a position in the legal department of BI?

  Executive director Eric Dimaculangan has been brought before the Manila prosecutors office for violations of:

Republic Act No. 7438

An Act defining certain rights of person arrested, detained or under custodial investigation as well as the duties of the arresting, detaining, and investigating officers and providing penalties for violations thereof.

Section 2. Rights of a Persons arrested, detained, or under custodial investigation. f) Any persons arrested or detained or under custodial investigation shall be allowed visits by or conference with any member of his immediate family......

Section 4. Penal clause.
b) Any person who obstructs, prevents or prohibits any lawyer, any member of immediate family of a person arrested, detained or custodial investigation ..... from visiting...... at any hour of the day or in urgent cases of the night shall suffer the penalty of imprisonment of not less than four (4) years nor more than six (6) years....

These "fantasy" rules and regulation deny visitation rights by the detainees immediate family members and spiritual councilers on every Monday of every week. This is in direct violation of Republic Act No. 7438.
Eric Dimaculangan, despite being brought before the Manila prosecutors office for violations listed, still continues to violate the law and prohibit visitations as allowed by the Republic Act No. 7438.

Eric Dimaculangan is also being charged for:

Book Two, Title Seven- Crimes committed by Public Officers
Chapter 6, Section 3, Usurpation of powers and unlawful appointments.
Article 239. Usurpation of legislative powers.
The penalties of prison correctional in its minimum period.....shall be imposed upon any public officer who shall encroach upon the powers of the legislative branch of the Government, either by making general rules or regulations beyond the scope of his authority, or by attempting to repeal a law or suspending the execution thereof.

Why do these BI officials still hold their positions? For instance, OIC Executive Director Eric Dimaculangan, he holds one of the most important and critical positions in the BI and yet, the Ombudsman has found enough evidence in criminal complaints to forward it to the Manila city Prosecutors office for investigation.
Why is this incompetent man allowed to continue to hold his position? By continuing to allow him to hold OIC Executive Director is highly negligent. The Bureau of Immigration is continuing to allow him to violate rights of due process and also commit more criminal acts against detainees.
What are this mans qualifications to hold such a position? Does he posess a Law or Political Science degree?
Why is Eric Dimaculangan allowed to violate the laws of the Philippines, he continues to operate Bicutan Immigration detention center as a jail.
Is this Commissioner Siegfried Misons idea of "Good guys in, bad guys out"? It did not take long for the Immigration crime syndicate to get back in business! This is Commissioner Siegfried Misons way of revamping Immigration personnel.

HERO BA ITO, O KOMUNISTANG GAGO??!

HE WAS A COMMUNIST SUPREMO AND SYMPATHIZER

              AND SO IS OUR PRESIDENT

                      OK LANG SA INYO?

PURISIMANG ELITISTANG PUTA!

Ang bilis makapag pahiram ng pera sa IMF-WB, pero ang bagal rumesponde sa Bagyo! Talagang anak ng puta!

 Kita niyo ba ang mukha niya mga kaibigan, namamaga ng hamburger. Maka-mayaman itong buang na ito.

Kris Aquino and Philip Salvador performing limbering exercises

The path to evil is coming . . .

JIM PAREDES ISANG PUTANG-INA!

Hoy Jim Paredes putang-ina ka! Asan ka na???!!!

MUKHA KA NG ANAL SEX AH! KAMUSTA NA ANG CIVIL SOCIETY FUCKERS MO?!

KINAKANTOT KA BA NI PNOY SA BUTAS NG PUWET MO???!!!

WHAT?? AN AMERICAN AT THE NATIONAL FOOD AUTHORITY??

TARANTADO PALA ITONG SINA ALCALA!

 Quezon mafia’ at DA!

Published : Monday, October 28, 2013 00:00

Article Views : 199

Written by : Paul M. Gutierrez

ACTIVIST lawyer Argee Guevarra yesterday criticized Agriculture Secretary Proceso Alcala’s “dubious choice of appointees,” including an “American” who has been chosen to head the National Food Authority (NFA), the country’s lead food security agency. 

In a statement, Guevarra accused Alcala of “turning the DA into his own personal playground, appointing members of his ‘Quezon mafia’ into the department, including Orlan Calayag, an American citizen, as NFA administrator.”
“These very same people have been repeatedly accused of involvement in various acts of corruption including the Napoles pork barrel fund scam, yet they seem to continue to enjoy the confidence of Alcala, their political benefactor,” said Guevarra.
“Calayag is an American citizen leading the charge for national food security. Since when did our laws, including the NFA Charter, allow for the appointment of someone who has renounced his Filipino citizenship in order to acquire a foreign one?”
Calayag, former aide of then-congressman Alcala, flew from the United States back to the Philippines on December 19, 2012 bearing US Passport No. 462971672. He has since acquired dual citizenship as American and Filipino more than a year later on  January 7, 2013 -- six months after his appointment as NFA administrator effective  July 1, 2012.
“How was Alcala able to dupe the President into signing Calayag’s appointment in the first place? Even assuming he has regained dual citizenship, still, that does not qualify him for appointment in our bureaucracy,” explained Guevarra, a UP-trained lawyer.
Citing jurisprudence in Maquiling vs. Comelec (G.R. No. 195649, 16 April 2013) and Mercado vs. Manzano (G.R. No. 135083, 26 May 1999), Guevarra argued: “first, one who renounces his Philippine citizenship when he became an American citizen is no longer a natural-born citizen of the Philippines; second, even when he became a dual citizen under RA No. 9225, he does not automatically re-acquire his status as a natural-born citizen of the Philippines.”
The NFA Charter states that its administrator must be a natural-born Filipino.
Calayag’s appointment into the NFA, “absent the vetting process required under the Government-Owned and Controlled Corporations (GOCC) Reform Law 1,” according to Guevarra, also made him chairman of the Food Terminals Inc. and director of the Philippine Fisheries Development Corp.
“This is precisely the kind of mindset that breeds corruption in the DA. When, with impunity, its officials think that they are above the law and can circumvent around it at will,” said Guevarra who first exposed the alleged P457- million overpricing in the DA and NFA’s government-to-government rice importation transaction in April. The said transaction is currently under investigation by both the Senate and House of Representatives.
This week, congressional representatives, COOP NATCCO partylist Rep. Anthony Bravo and Laguna 3rd district Rep. Sol Aragones appealed for “wiser government spending” in the agriculture sector, while Agri-Agra Reporma Para sa Magsasakang Pilipinas (AGRI) partylist Rep. Delph Gan Lee filed House Bill (HB) No. 2936 seeking to end the “NFA’s monopoly on rice importation” as it has supposedly “adversely contributed to the price of the staple grain.”
Rice prices in September hit all-time highs even as the NFA invested heavily in government-led importations, spending US$94.5 million or more than P4 billion to import 205,700 MT of rice from Vietnam in April of 2013, and some P1.7 billion in importation duties and taxes.

Aside from Calayag, farmers’ group Kilusang Magbubukid ng Pilipinas (KMP) earlier named the following as members of Alcala’s “Quezon mafia”: DA Undersecretary for Administration and Finance Antonio Fleta; Arnulfo Mañalac who served as Alcala’s administrator for the Sariaya Bagsakan Center in 2007; DA Assistant Secretary Ed de Luna; Philippine Coconut Authority Administrator and Alcala legal consultant Euclides G. Forbes; Claro Maranan of the National Irrigation Administration; Bureau of Fisheries and Aquatic Resources Director Asis Perez; Bureau of Plant Industry Director Lito Baron; Philippine Fishing Development Authority Director Rodrigo Jimenez and Agri Technical Insititute director Nicomedes Eleazar.
Fleta, along with DA assistant secretaries Ophelia Agawin and Salvador Salacup, all Alcala appointees, were also implicated in the Napoles pork barrel fund controversy.

Liars, Traitors and Hypocrites!

 - - -

 

Ako worried talaga!

"Folks, di pa ba kayo worried?
Inuubos na nila ang pera ng taong bayan tapos di man lang kayo nagre-react?"

"Hindi niyo pa ba nahahalata ang mga kasinungalingan ng Daang Matuwid ni Noynoy?"

"Hellooooow?"

Boy Scout 101

Mr. President, isn't it too late in the day to go on a camping experience, while being obnoxious to the feelings of suffering earthquake victims???

                  Hilo ka na ba Mr. President?

 

At ipinagmamalaki mo pa raw ang sarap ng simoy ng hangin diyan sa Bohol.

Bakit hindi ka nalang mag-apply ng trabahong scout master.

                                     - - -

  

               Take it from me, Mr. Boy Iskawat.