PATAY KA!

HOY PORONTONG, NAKAMAMATAY RAW ANG DAANG MATUWID MO!

                                    + + +

                               EH ANO?!!

 

LOKO KANG GAGO KA AH! TIGILAN MO NA IYAN HA!!!

JIM PAREDES, HOY PUTANG-INA !

HOY MOKONG! ITONG PRESIDENTE MO, ISANG TARANTADO! KAYO-KAYO ANG NAG-PROMOTE NG PAGKATAO NITO!

PUTANG-INA KA JIM PAREDES! PA-CIVIL-CIVIL SOCIETY KA PA PUNYETA KA!

KAYA MO BANG SAGUTIN ANG PROBLEMA NG TAONG BAYAN?? HA!?? YUNG MGA PINAG-TATANGGAL NI AQUINO SA TRABAHO, KAYA MO BANG TUSTUSAN ANG PANG ARAW-ARAW NG MGA TAONG ITO? HA!??

PUTANG-INA KA! NG DAHIL SA MGA CIVIL-CIVIL SOCIETY NA YAN, NAGKANDA-LECHE-LECHE ANG BUHAY NAMING MGA MIDDLE CLASS AT MGA PROFESSIONALS!

MAY NANGYARI BANG MABUTI SA EDSA NIYO????HA??????

THE ORIGINAL CRIME FAMILY

DI LANG PALA MATATAKAW ANG MGA ITO, MAY MGA SIRA RIN PALA SA ULO!

MALING AKALA

1. AKALA MO MATUWID SILA, CORRUPT DIN PALA
2. AKALA MO KAKAMPI KA NILA, ILALAGLAG KA PALA
3. AKALA MO MABABAIT SILA, YUN PALA, MGA USER SILA
4. AKALA MO MALINIS KA, MARUMI KA SA PANINGIN NILA
5. AKALA MO MAY PAG-ASA KANG UMASENSO SA KANILA, SIYEMPRE SILA MUNA
6, MAPAG-MATAASIN, MAYABANG, AT MGA TARANTADO

GANYAN SILA LAHAT. 

LAHAT NG MGA APPOINTEES NI PNOY GANYAN. MULA LINE AGENCY HEADS HANGGANG BUREAU CHIEFS, GANYAN ANG MGA UGALI,

BOBO, MAPAG-MATAASIN AT TRAYDOR SA EMPLEYADO.

EXAMPLE:

1. FLORENCIO ABAD NA AKALA MO, KANYA ANG PERA SA DBM
2, PURISIMANG BUSOG SA PERA NG FINANCE
3.KIM HENARES NA UNANO, TAX NG TAX NG MIDDLE CLASS
4. LACIERDANG TANGA
5. LLAMAS NA NILAMAS NA NG NEW PEOPLE'S ARMY
6. HONRADO NG NAIA NA PARANG UNGGOY AT MALALAKI ANG BUTAS NG KANYANG ILONG
7. DELIMA NG JUSTICE NA DEMONYO. MUKHANG GILID NG KASILYAS ANG MUKHA NIYA
8. ALCALA NG DENR NA SMUGGLER NG SIBUYAS AT MUKHA NG SIBUYAS
9. SI MAR ROXAS NG DILG NA NAGMUMUKHANG PUSANG ASIWA SA MGA TAO
10. RICARDO DAVID NG IMMIGRATION NA NAG-RESIGN SA KAHIHIYAN KASI DI MARUNONG MAG-INGLES
11. JAIL WARDEN ERIC DIMACULANGAN NG IMMIGRATION NA KINAKANTOT RAW ANG KANYANG SECRETARY NA MAY ASAWA NA, ISA PA RING IMMORAL NA UNGGOY
12. RUFFY BIAZON NA NAPAKA-INEPT SA CUSTOMS, PINA-RERESIGN LAHAT?!!!
13. SI ABIGAIL VALTE NA UBOD NG TABA AT YABANG AT MUKHA NG ATSAY NG MALACANANG
14, SI EXECUTIVE SECRETARY OCHOANG PIPE AT BINGI, CONTRACTOR PALA NG MGA GOVERNMENT PROJECTS
15. SI ESQUIVEL NG MWSS NA HIPOKRITO, MUKHA NG ALLOWANCE ANG PAGMUMUKHA
16. VOLTAIRE GAZMIN NG DEFENSE NA MUKHA NG MAY SAKIT NA PROSTRATE CANCER
17. VIRGINA TORRES NG LTO, MUKHA NG PEKPEK

WHAT WOULD HE GAIN?

WHAT WOULD DANDING STAND TO GAIN IF HE WOULD ORDER NINOY'S EXECUTION?

NINOY

THE COMMUNIST SUPREMO

WHO ADVOCATED LAND DISTRIBUTION

HMMM....GOT IT?

NOY IS USING ALL THE RESOURCES OF THE GOVERNMENT TO MAKE HIS ELITE FRIENDS RICHER BY THE SECOND

Lopez foundation rips off gov’t in La Mesa deal—audit

• Written by  Chito Lozada
• Friday, 12 April 2013 00:00

MWSS ends up with empty bag in agreement 
The supposed civic arm of the Lopez Group’s ABS-CBN Corp., ABS-CBN Foundation Inc. (AFI) had appropriated the La Mesa Ecopark operations as its own, denying the Metropolitan Waterworks and Sewerage System (MWSS) its share in a 2001 concession signed between both and the local government of Quezon City.
According to a 2011 report of the Commission on Audit (CoA), state auditors found deficiencies in both the memorandum of agreement (MoA) and memorandum of understanding (MoU) signed among the three for the operation of the ecopark which is also known as the La Mesa Resort Zone.
Under the MoA, a profit sharing of 40 percent of net income for MWSS, 30 percent for AFI and 30 percent for the Quezon City government was agreed on.
The CoA audit showed from 2004 to June 30, 2009, the La Mesa Ecopark operation earned P22 million in net income. “Based on the audited financial statements of the La Mesa Ecopark, the total income for the period 2005 to June 2009 was P20.8 million, hence the share of MWSS should be P8,3 million subject to income tax.
The CoA report, however, stated that the 40 percent share of MWSS on the net income after tax of the project “has not been remitted.”
The CoA also noted that AFI, which is headed by Gina Lopez, a member of the media business clan, had managed to obtain a greater share in the venture than either the MWSS or the QC government, since AFI deducts 15 percent from the gross revenue of the ecopark operations as management fee.
“In managing and operating the La Mesa Ecopark, AFI deducts 15 percent from the gross revenue thereof as management fees. However, no supporting document was presented to show approval by either the MWSS Board of Trustees or La Mesa Executive Board on the 15 percent management fee being charged by the AFI,” according to the CoA.
“Furthermore, with AFI charging another 15 percent management fee on gross revenue over and above the existing profit-sharing of 40 percent as MWSS share, 30 percent each for AFI and LGQC, it would now appear that AFI has a greater share in the revenues and income derived from the operations of the La Mesa Resort Zone,” according to the report.
In the ABS-CBN website, it was stated that “all income generated by La Mesa Ecopark is utilized for the continuous preservation and protection of La Mesa Watershed.”
CoA said a review of the MoU dated Nov. 23, 2001 and MoA (undated) executed by MWSS with AFI and the Local Government of Quezon City had several deficiencies.
It also cited conflicting provisions in the MoU and the MoA signed among the three relative to the Environmental Trust Fund (ETF).
“Section 1 of the MoA provides for the creation at La Mesa Resort Zone – Executive Committee (LMRZ-EC) composed of two representatives each from MWSS, AFI, and the QC government in which the committee shall take the stewardship of the Environmental Trust Fund (ETF) under the control of the MWSS board of trustees (BOT) and under the supervision of the La Mesa Executive Board (LMEB).
“However, under Section 1.a.v of Article IV of the MoU– Management and Operations Framework-the LMEB shall take stewardship and control of the ETF,” according to the report.
The CoA required the MWSS board to clearly designate the stewardship and control of the Environmental Trust Fund.
It added that section 1.2 of the MoA also provided that the LMRZ-EC will be tasked to approve and supervise the implementation of the La Mesa Resort Framework Plan and all programs and plans relative to the operation of the La Mesa Resort Zone. “However, no committee was formed since the inception of the contract,” according to the CoA.
The CoA recommended the creation of the LMRZ-EC that will formulate policies regarding the LMRZ aside from other functions and responsibilities stated in the MoA.
“Upon creation, members of the proposed body should convene regularly to address and assess the operations and concern of the LMRZ/La Mesa Ecopark,” it said.
The CoA also cited section 6 of the MoA that required all funds generated from the operation of the LMRZ should be deposited under a special account for the Environmental Trust Fund (ETF) to be opened in the name of MWSS, AFI and the Quezon City government “and any or all transactions or withdrawal involving the ETF shall be considered approved if signed and approved by at least two official representatives or signatories of either MWSS and AFI, or MWSS and LGQC.”
CoA said, however, documents showed that all accounts were opened in the name of AFI only and “transactions/withdrawals were made without the consent of MWSS.”
The CoA said that the parties involved in the agreement should comply with the provisions of section 6 of the MoA “to maintain sound internal controls by opening an account in the name of the three contracting parties.”
“All transactions shall be authorized with the consent of MWSS representative,” the CoA added.
It also cited violations of section 22 of the MoA that mentioned four requisites for the agreement to be effective which were that the MoA shall be signed by the parties; approved by proper authorities; and reviewed by the Office of the Government Corporate Council (OGCC) and ratified by the QC Sanggunian.
“Requisites 2 and 4 were not complied with. There was no MWSS resolution approving the MoA as per certification by the Board Secretariat of MWSS. Also, the contract was not ratified by the QC Sanggunian as confirmed by Mr. Francisco Mallillin to IAD Manager Bienvenido A. Sarmiento based on the report of Virgilio P. Matel, Officer-in-Charge of the Internal Audit Department during that time,” the CoA said.
The CoA said the MWSS should require the post facto approval and ratification of the MoA to enable the agreement to be fully effective.
“Otherwise, the MoA could be considered null and void,” it added.
The CoA also noted that the 40 percent share in the net income generated from La Mesa Ecopark operation (La Mesa Resort Zone) was not recorded in the books of the MWSS pursuant to section 11 of the MoA among the parties involved.
“Section 11 of the MoA requires that financial report shall be prepared and submitted by the AFI to the La Mesa Executive Board (LMEB) from its initial operation ending June 30, 2005 and the annual financial report thereafter and the income shall be distributed among the parties accordingly,” CoA added.
The AFI, however, failed to submit the annual financial report as required in the MiA.
“Finally, on Nov. 5, 2009, the Internal Audit Department (IAD) of MWSS received the audited Financial Statements of La Mesa Ecopark/Watershed Operation covering the period 2004 to June 30, 2009 or a period of five years,” it said.
The CoA noted that based on financial report, included in the direct expenses was the 15 percent management fee charged by the AFI amounting to P20.5 million for five and a half years “whereas the 40 percent  share of MWSS on the net income after tax has not been remitted as of today.”
The CoA tasked the MWSS to require the AFI to submit the annual financial report and remit the corresponding share of income to the MWSS.
“The books of account of the La Mesa Ecopark should be made available to the duly authorized representative of MWSS as required under Section 12 of the MoA,” it added.

DWENDENG MAGNANAKAW!

Marami siyang na-disburse na pera amounting to MILLIONS OF PESOS para sa CONDITIONAL CASH TRANSFER program, pero according to the COMMISSION ON AUDIT, marami raw defects ang ibinigay niyang accounting/liquidation report sa COA.

WHAT IS HAPPENING DINKY DWARF?

NAGNANAKAW KA NA RIN BA NG PERA NG TAONG BAYAN?

BAKIT KULANG-KULANG RAW ANG MGA "RESIBONG" IBINIBIGAY MO SA COA?

WHAT IS HAPPENING WITH ALL THE MONEY THAT WE HAVE BEEN PAYING AS TAXES???

MAG-ACCOUNTING KA NGA, PUNYETA KANG DWENDENG KA!!!!!!

BULOK NA CHIEF JUSTICE! HEAVEN HELP US!

 CJ issues fake SC resolution  (FROM DAILY TRIBUNE)

Calls in sick, fearing rebuke by SC justices over spurious en banc paper

 

The Chief Justice of the Philippines is in hot legal and constitutional water.

President Aquino’s favorite Supreme Court Justice, Chief Justice Lourdes Sereno, the other day was caught treading the crooked path, as she was found to have issued an en banc resolution on her own, while stating that the high court en banc issued a resolution last Nov. 27, on the reopening of the Regional Trial Court Administration Office in Region 7, and that the Court resolved to ratify the action of the Chief Justice.
There was a big problem, however. The Court en banc never issued that resolution, and  the issue would have been brought up, followed by a heated discussion if not heated confrontation between the justices and Sereno. But Sereno tried to evade the confrontation as she called in sick yesterday, fearing the wrath of the SC justices over what can be termed an illegal and unconstitutional act, which is impeachable.
There is, however, doubt that Aquino would have the House of Representatives impeach his Palace-friendly Chief Justice.
Sereno put off an appointment with a scorching hot en banc conference with her fellow magistrates last Tuesday, all of whom  were scheduled to take up the circumstances in connection with an unauthorized SC resolution supposedly passed by an unseen hand in the head magistrate’s office.
Sereno took an unceremonious absence during the session which included in its agenda the resolution ordering the opening of a Regional Court Administration Offie (RCAO) in the Visayas.
The same spurious resolution had Sereno appointing Judge Geraldine Faith Econg to be the Officer in Charge of RCAO Region 7.
The resolution, which bore the signature of the clerk of court had magistrates up in arms as it had not been  authorized beforehand by the 14-man man court.
There was also a denial that the SC en banc appointed Econg as officer in charge of RCAO Region  7.
Instead of facing the music,Sereno issued a Special Order No. 1384 designating Senior Associate Justice Antonio T. Carpio as Acting Chief Justice .
“In view of the sick leave of absence of the undersigned, Senior Associate Justice Antonio T. Carpio is hereby designated as Acting Chief Justice, with authority to exercise the powers and prerogatives of and pertaining to the position of Chief Justice on matters that cannot wait for the Justice, effective today, Dec.  4, 2012, until the undersigned reports back to work,” Sereno’s Order read.
Earlier, a broadsheet reported that Sereno was rebuffed by fellow magistrates whom she had personally approached  to ratify the order . Among the offices she reportedly visited were the chambers of Justices Teresita Leonardo-De Castro, Arturo Brion and Martin Villarama Jr.
The Justices, however, have refused to play along with the ratification of Sereno’s lone act of issuing the resolution without the authorization of the SC en banc to revive   and reopen of RCAO in Region 7 in Cebu City.
It was Justice De Castro who wrote a letter to the  SC en banc questioning the resolution issued by Sereno without authority from the en banc.
The court has designated Justice Presbitero Velasco to talk to Econg not to perform her duties and assume her post.
Sereno went to Cebu last Thursday for the re-launching and re-opening of RCAO where invitations were earlier sent out to the court.
It was the first time for Sereno not to  attend Tuesday the en banc session of the Supreme Court. It was speculated that Sereno would be facing great embarassment at having the effrontery to come up with the spurious resolution and still expected to have the same ratified by the SC justices.
The Justices of the SC were said to have been surprised at how Sereno suddenly got sick after it was reported she was lobbying Monday when she personally went to the chambers of Justices De Castro, Brion and Villarama.
Sereno also lobbied with other justices over the telephone to support her and not to revoke the reopening of the Regional Court Administration Office Region 7.
The Justices of the SC last weekend denied Sereno’s order that a resolution be issued ratifying her act for the revival and reopening of RCAO in Region 7 in Cebu City.
They also denied that they allowed Sereno to appoint Judge  Econg to be the Officer-in-Charge of RCAO Region 7.
During Tuesday’s en banc session presided by Carpio, the issue as to the RCAO was still pursued.
The SC en banc has decided to put on hold the assumption of Econg as RCAO head.
An earlier report said the magistrates were fuming mad and were quoted as having said that  Sereno is “fooling the court and the public.”
The court insider said that the chief justice would be in big trouble if the SC en banc will “revoke” or “recall” the resolution she issued.
Much earlier, when it was a hot issue for Sereno and the other justices to bare their statements of assets and liabilities (SALn), Sereno issued a copy of her SALn, which emanated not from the office of the Clerk of Court, who is the officer who is empowered to release the SALns to the public, with an en banc’s order, but from her office.
It was evident from her SALn released by her office, that there were newer entries, made to explain the big fees in dollars that she got as a legal researcher for the government’s legal panel in the Piatco arbitration case.
She later explained that the “corrected copy” was the one released by the clerk of court, which had no corrections, and was said to be the SALn that she had submitted to the clerk of court.

The appointment made by Aquino of Sereno, then a junior justice to the top judicial post, has reportedly not been taken well by the senior justices, who have been demoralized.
Just recently, Aquino also appointed an outsider, former chief government panel negotiator for the Moro Islamic peace pact, Marvic Leonen.
It was also reported that his appointment was not taken well by the justices of the high court.            With PNA

Read 133 times 


It seems that this country under NOY TARANTADO AQUINO will really go under the dogs.We definitely are ruled by juveniles and crazies that are not well versed in the rule of law, Constitution and sound administrative management. 

Left or Right, walang credibility and mga tao sa administrasyong Aquino kasi lahat puro mga kawatan, sira ang ulo at unstable-minded, if there is even such a word.

 God help us from Noy Aquino, Cojuangcos and from Florencio Abad, They are the cause of many people's misery.