MAR ROXAS SAYS THAT THERE IS ORDER ENOUGH TO SUSPEND "GWEN GARCI".
ROXAS BULLSHITS THAT THERE HAS BEEN A COMPLAINT THAT WAS PREVIOUSLY FILED AGAINST GWEN AND THAT IT IS VALID AND BINDING UNDER EXISTING LAWS. ROXAS ALSO BULLSHITS THAT GWEN SHOULD RESPECT THE LAW FOR ACCORDING TO HIM, "THERE ARE LAWS TO BE RESPECTED."
ROXAS BULLSHITS THAT THERE HAS BEEN A COMPLAINT THAT WAS PREVIOUSLY FILED AGAINST GWEN AND THAT IT IS VALID AND BINDING UNDER EXISTING LAWS. ROXAS ALSO BULLSHITS THAT GWEN SHOULD RESPECT THE LAW FOR ACCORDING TO HIM, "THERE ARE LAWS TO BE RESPECTED."
GWEN GARCI ON THE OTHER HAND CLAIMS THAT 1. THE COMPLAINANT HAS DIED, 2.THE VICE-GOVERNOR DID NOT HAVE ANY "ACTIVE PARTICIPATION" TO THE PREVIOUS CLAIM WHEN SHE ASSUMED HER OFFICE AS THE SAME, 3.THE RESOLUTION SHOULD HAVE BEEN MADE WITHIN 30 DAYS, 4. THE ORDER WAS NOT SERVED ON THE PERSON OF THE GOVERNOR AS ADMINISTRATIVE RULES PROVIDE, 5. THE ORDER WAS POSTED AT THE BULLETIN BOARD AS GENERAL NOTICE, 6. THE ORDER WAS NOT ORIGINAL AND WAS ONLY A PHOTOCOPY AND ABOVE ALL, THE CASE OR COMPLAINT ON ITS "FACE" AT THE RECENT, DID NOT SHOW ANY CULPABILITY ON THE PART OF THE GOVERNOR.
SO QUESTIONS REMAIN.
WHY RESUSCITATE A CASE AND RELEASE A DEPARTMENTAL ORDER NOW, AN ORDER THAT HAS BEEN IN "ABEYANCE" FOR MORE THAN 400 DAYS AND ALREADY IN CONFLICT OF THE RULES ON ADMINISTRATION OF PUBLIC OFFICIALS?
WHY IS IT ONLY A PHOTOCOPY?
WHY IS IT NOT SERVED PROPERLY ON THE PERSON OF GWEN?
WHY WAS IT SERVED ONLY NOW, DURING THE CHRISTMAS SEASON AND NEARING ELECTION PERIOD?
WHY THE SURPRISE?
DI BA PARANG GINAGAGO TAYO NI ABNOY AT ROXAS NA ITO????
WHEN PADACA HAD A CASE AT THE SANDIGANBAYAN WHICH MERITED HER A WARRANT FOR HER ARREST, SHE WAS PERSONALLY BAILED BAILED OUT (ON PRESIDENT'S ORDERS) BY MAR ROXAS BECAUSE ACCORDING TO MAR ROXAS, " OK NAMAN SIYA". "WE BELIEVE HER CAUSE."
PERO DI BA MAY MALAKING KASO SI PADACA AMOUNTING TO PLUNDER OF MILLIONS OF PESOS, DI BA?
WAS SHE ARRESTED BY THE PHILIPPINE NATIONAL POLICE????
DI BA SI SECRETARY FOR PULPOLITIKAL ADVISE NA SI LLAMAS NAHULIHAN NG AK-47 SA TRUNK NG KOTSE NIYA ? AT NG ANTI-PIRACY PRACTICES ACT WHEN HE WAS CAUGHT BUYING ILLEGAL VIDEO MATERIALS???
WAS HE ARRESTED AND CHARGED WITH ANTI- DVD PIRACY PRACTICES ACT AND ILLEGAL POSSESSION OF FIREARMS????
HOW ABOUT SI SECRETARY PUNO FOR ILLEGAL ARMS DEAL, SMUGGLING AND CORRUPTION AT THE DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT?
WAS HE CHARGED BEFORE THE OFFICE OF THE OMBUDSMAN????
HOW ABOUT NAGUIAT OF PAGCOR?
HE WAS SEEN GOING ABOUT TO MACAU, HONGKONG AND MALAYSIA CONDUCTING JUNKET TRIPS AND RECEIVING MILLIONS IN GAMBLING BRIBES BY CHINESE INVESTOR-PARTNERS?
WAS HE EVER INVESTIGATED? WAS HE EFFECTIVELY REMOVED FROM OFFICE???
HOW ABOUT CHEAP JUSTICE SERENO?
DI BA SHE FAILED THE PSYCHOLOGICAL EXAMS FOR THE "HIGHEST SC APPOINTED OFFICE"?
WAS SHE PREVENTED FROM ASSUMING HER OFFICE AS THE CHIEF JUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT, CONSIDERING THAT HER POSITION AS HAVING FAILED THE EXAM WAS PATENTLY ILLEGAL???
AND BY WAY OF REMINISCING, DID THEY EVER RESPECT THE CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT OF TRAVEL OF THIS WOMAN??
THE SUPREME COURT THEN ALLOWED HER TO TRAVEL. AND THEY DISBARRED HER AT THE AIRPORT.
DID MAR ROXAS AND ABNOY AQUINO RESPECT HER CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT OF TRAVEL AND THE LAW IN THIS CASE? O GUMAWA NA LANG SILA NG SARILI MGA BATAS NILA??? AS AUTHORED BY LEILA SATANAS DELIMA???
WHEN CJ CORONA WAS AT THE HELM OF THE IMPEACHMENT PROCEEDING, THE AQUINO PEOPLE VIOLATED THE AMLA (ANTI-MONEY LAUNDERING LAW) WHEN IT DISCLOSED ALL THE ASSETS AND MONIES OF CJ CORONA WITHOUT HIS CONSENT AT PROCEEDING AT THAT TIME.
WHEN CJ CORONA WAS AT THE HELM OF THE IMPEACHMENT PROCEEDING, THE AQUINO PEOPLE VIOLATED THE AMLA (ANTI-MONEY LAUNDERING LAW) WHEN IT DISCLOSED ALL THE ASSETS AND MONIES OF CJ CORONA WITHOUT HIS CONSENT AT PROCEEDING AT THAT TIME.
WHAT HYPOCRISY COMING FROM THE MOUTH OF ROXAS??!!
MAR, KUMAKAIN KA NA BA NG PAGKAIN NG BABOY AT HINDI MO NA ALAM ANG MGA SINASABI MO?
BOBO KA PALA PUTANG-INA KA! WHARTON SHIT KA LANG PALANG TARANTADO KA!
ANO ANG SINASABI MO MAR MONKEY ROXAS?
NA SILA MGA UNGGOY KAYO HINDI??
REALLY??
WELL KUNG HINDI NGA NAMAN KAYO UNGGOY, ANO KAYO?
PHOTOGENIC?
O HETO AMO MO O!
Walang komento:
Mag-post ng isang Komento